Skip to main content

Serving With Love

By Angela Wittman

"I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.But he that is an hireling, and not the shepherd, whose own the sheep are not, seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth: and the wolf catcheth them, and scattereth the sheep.The hireling fleeth, because he is an hireling, and careth not for the sheep."

(John 10:11-13, KJV)

"In A.D. 390, a riot occurred in Thessalonica and the Roman Governor, Botheric, was killed. Theodosius, the Roman emperor at the time, invited the people of the city for games and entertainment in the Hippodrome and then had 7,000 of them slain.

Ambrose, the Bishop of Milan, rose to the role of the good shepherd ready to lay down his life for his sheep. He wrote to Theodosius and told him to publicly repent for the evil he had done. Roman emperors were not in the habit of humbling themselves, and Theodosius refused Ambroses' demand. That set the stage for the high drama that ensued.

As Theodosius attempted to enter the church he attended, Ambrose literally interposed himself between Theodosius and the entrance (and hence the people, the church). Ambrose clearly believed that the emperor was under God's law and should humble himself and serve that law. By the grace of God, Theodosius yielded. He stripped himself of his imperial insignia, entered the church and publicly called upon the Lord to forgive his sin in the matter. The good news kept coming - Ambrose became an unofficial counselor to Theodosius and was thus in a position to have a hand in rewriting Roman law to provide for what we now call due process. Ambrose believed, and happily Theodosius concurred, that the law of God is over the king because the King of kings of every realm is King Jesus who has the nations of the earth as His inheritance.

What a shock to those of our time who incorrectly claim that there is a constitutional separation of church and state. Ambrose was clearly not functioning as a magistrate, but he did instruct in a very conspicuous fashion his head of state. Moreover, when the magistrate became beast, Ambrose exposed him for what he was. What a boost to the prestige of the gospel in the eyes of the people. Do the people of our time get an equally vibrant view of the crown rights of King Jesus?"

(Interposition:Lawful Resistance to Tyranny by Larry Pratt, Executive Director of Gun Owners of America)

Dear Friends,

I recently attended a public meeting of one of the local governing bodies in our community in which I was so very discouraged by the behavior of some of the men elected by local voters to represent us as public servants.

Some of these elected officials made snide remarks, while others mocked and showed blatant disrespect for a local business man who also happens to be a Christian.

How my heart aches for the man who has had to endure such public shame! (Some of you may remember the contempt shown to me when I served on a local school board and advocated a return to our traditional Christian teachings in the government schools.)

This local business owner was shown the same type of disrespect and ridicule by those elected to shepherd or serve the community.

I feel compelled to write this editorial in hope that those reading it will remember that in order to lead, you must first know how to serve.

And how much better it is for those serving to do it as God pleases rather than as man pleases!

I pray that the badly behaved elected officials will know who I am referring to and they will make a conscious effort to behave with dignity and true humility in the future as they represent a large segment of our local population and that they will no longer set a bad example as leaders who appear to lord their position over others and treat others discourteously.

I also pray that when we go to the voting booth in the future, we will cast our ballots for Christian Statesmen that have shown they will lead us with courage, commitment to true patriotism, and have based their lives on the Word of God.

Only when we vote for such a high caliber of a candidate will we once more see public servants truly serving with love and in righteousness.

How can we turn back the tide of evil that is sweeping across our land, evidenced by murder, rape, theft and ever the increasing violations of human rights?

Only by electing "shepherds" with a Biblical worldview.

Dear friends, we must no longer accept the false notion that we must vote for the "lesser of two evils"! There are men and women of high standards who are more than willing and qualified to hold public office. Perhaps you know of someone that you believe displays the honorable character required of a leader or you may even be that person. If so, then let us be bold and step out in the faith of our LORD and support not the "lesser of evil" any longer but the best Christian man or woman for the task of serving us.

I encourage you to get involved by attending local government meetings, contacting your legislators and then speaking what is on your mind.

Let us no longer look the other way when we see abuses by those elected to public office to serve their constituents.

May the good LORD bless us as we boldly stand with Him in righteousness and all truth! Perhaps He shall even be so pleased as to give us "shepherds" who will serve us with LOVE.

Originally published in 2003.


Popular Posts (All Time)

A discerning look at 'Biblical Patriarchy' and those who abuse it

By Angela Wittman While much of what Doug Phillips teaches regarding Patriarchy sounds biblical, because of the lack of practical application, his teachings are often taken to extremes. Sometimes, men just hear his vision of men always “leading,” and they become domineering and demanding, causing undue stress on the wife. I know of one family that divorced precisely because of hearing this teaching and not understanding what it really should be. Sometimes, men will try to emulate what they see in Doug Phillips, and start requiring their families to have all the same rules as the Phillips. Unfortunately, if there are no personal convictions behind the rules, they soon become extremely oppressive and smother the family. Some men just have no clue about how to “lead” their families; they just know that it’s being constantly preached at them from the pulpit. Having come from a home without a godly leader, these men need lots of practical examples. (Taken from: Doug Phillips’ Kangaroo Court

'Of Saving Faith'

The Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter XIV Of Saving Faith I. The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, [1] is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts, [2] and is ordinarily wrought by the ministry of the Word, [3] by which also, and by the administration of the sacraments, and prayer, it is increased and strengthened. [4] II. By this faith, a Christian believes to be true whatsoever is revealed in the Word, for the authority of God himself speaking therein; [5] and acts differently upon that which each particular passage thereof contains; yielding obedience to the commands, [6] trembling at the threatenings, [7] and embracing the promises of God for this life, and that which is to come. [8] But the principal acts of saving faith are accepting, receiving, and resting upon Christ alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life, by virtue of the covenant of grace. [9] III. This faith is differ

A discerning look at Ted Weiland's "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective"

By Angela Wittman I believe I have found within the Scriptures the key to what made America great, and this key can restore her to her former greatness. - Ted Weiland, ( Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution; The Christian Perspective , A couple of years ago Ted Weiland contacted me and asked if he might send me his primer on  Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective . After receiving and reviewing the primer, I decided to toss it in the trash due to the concern that Mr. Weiland was missing a foundational point - Biblical covenanting.  And after recently reviewing his work in greater detail, I believe the reformed and theonomic community should be cautious about Mr. Weiland's book and his beliefs. Due to some glaring "red flags" I encountered while researching Mr. Weiland, I've decided to write this warning and state my concerns. First of a