Skip to main content

Google and the push to "Legalize Love"

By Angela Wittman

Updated 8.14.2012

Christian Post recently featured an article on Google and its push/campaign to "Legalize Love" in countries that Google has offices "where homosexual activities are illegal or same-sex relationships are not legally recognized."

The Christian Post article goes on to quote Mark Palmer-Edgecumbe, the head of Google's Diversity and Inclusion department for Europe, Middle East and Africa regions as saying, "We want our employees who are gay or lesbian or transgender to have the same experience outside the office as they do in the office." And he then goes on to give Singapore as an example of a country where homosexuality is banned and Poland which does not legally recognize homosexual marriage.

Frankly, Google isn't looking to "Legalize Love" because one cannot make a feeling or emotion legal or illegal.  It is my opinion that Google is seeking to overturn long-held political and cultural foundations of countries that it thinks aren't operating as they believe is in the best interest of mankind.  Doesn't this sound a bit like Google has become somewhat delusional about its place in society?  It reminds me of the story of the Titanic that was advertised as too big to fail; we all know how that story ended.

As one who tries to live a life based on principle, I am dissociating from Google due to their political agenda and recently moved my blogs from the blog hosting service it owns.

My new blog links are:

My advice for Christians is to leave the sinking ship called Google as a matter of principle.

Here are links to additional articles that you might find helpful:

Updated 4.19.2014 - AW

Comments

  1. [...] Read more… Share this:TwitterFacebookEmailPrintMorePinterestRedditStumbleUponTumblrDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this. This entry was posted in Angela Wittman, Homosexuality, Social Media and tagged Google, Homosexuality. [...]

    ReplyDelete
  2. I left Google for Firefox; and it's faster too. Even Google's little button looks very much New Age to me. What's next? Bestiality? Pedophilia?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I also use Firefox and have tried to limit my use of anything Google. :) We probably haven't reached the total depths of depravity.. I don't even want to consider how low society (or Google) will go. May God help/strengthen us to endure.

    ReplyDelete
  4. We'll make it; Jesus has promised! Can't wait for that glorious return when He comes as Ruler, King . . . and Judge!
    Hold on to Jesus, sis! We'll endure!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Reblogged this on Christian Heritage News & Commentary and commented:
    There's been much talk about leaving WordPress for other blog sites due to their offensive "rainbow" on the reader page. Please be aware of why I left Blogger in 2012 while you contemplate moving.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I respect your decision. I will stay to continue to have an influence as long as possible. Our Supreme Court has drastically overstepped its Constitutional bounds, but they are only reflecting a confused society. This generation may not see the pain that will come to our society as more and more people live in rejection of the opposite gender. Odd, those whose actions, not just words, most reflect judgment and dissociation with the "other half" of society are considered champions of equality?!

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree and plan to stay at WP until they begin censoring my posts.

    ReplyDelete
  8. AS do I dear sis. I had looked at blogger, even started a way to move my blog, but the more thought I gave it the more I refuse to allow anyone to run me off. I intend to stand and speak the truth until they censor or delete my account at WordPress. Probably not a popular stance on the blog that has moved, but they can run if they so choose, I don't really care. Me...I'm standing and speaking and praying that many dead ears are awakened and many souls are saved by that stance. All to God's glory, because it really IS all about Him.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts (All Time)

A discerning look at 'Biblical Patriarchy' and those who abuse it

By Angela Wittman While much of what Doug Phillips teaches regarding Patriarchy sounds biblical, because of the lack of practical application, his teachings are often taken to extremes. Sometimes, men just hear his vision of men always “leading,” and they become domineering and demanding, causing undue stress on the wife. I know of one family that divorced precisely because of hearing this teaching and not understanding what it really should be. Sometimes, men will try to emulate what they see in Doug Phillips, and start requiring their families to have all the same rules as the Phillips. Unfortunately, if there are no personal convictions behind the rules, they soon become extremely oppressive and smother the family. Some men just have no clue about how to “lead” their families; they just know that it’s being constantly preached at them from the pulpit. Having come from a home without a godly leader, these men need lots of practical examples. (Taken from: Doug Phillips’ Kangaroo Court

A discerning look at Ted Weiland's "Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective"

By Angela Wittman I believe I have found within the Scriptures the key to what made America great, and this key can restore her to her former greatness. - Ted Weiland, ( Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution; The Christian Perspective , http://www.bibleversusconstitution.org/BlvcOnline/biblelaw-constitutionalism-preface.html) A couple of years ago Ted Weiland contacted me and asked if he might send me his primer on  Bible Law vs. the United States Constitution: The Christian Perspective . After receiving and reviewing the primer, I decided to toss it in the trash due to the concern that Mr. Weiland was missing a foundational point - Biblical covenanting.  And after recently reviewing his work in greater detail, I believe the reformed and theonomic community should be cautious about Mr. Weiland's book and his beliefs. Due to some glaring "red flags" I encountered while researching Mr. Weiland, I've decided to write this warning and state my concerns. First of a

'Of Saving Faith'

The Westminster Confession of Faith Chapter XIV Of Saving Faith I. The grace of faith, whereby the elect are enabled to believe to the saving of their souls, [1] is the work of the Spirit of Christ in their hearts, [2] and is ordinarily wrought by the ministry of the Word, [3] by which also, and by the administration of the sacraments, and prayer, it is increased and strengthened. [4] II. By this faith, a Christian believes to be true whatsoever is revealed in the Word, for the authority of God himself speaking therein; [5] and acts differently upon that which each particular passage thereof contains; yielding obedience to the commands, [6] trembling at the threatenings, [7] and embracing the promises of God for this life, and that which is to come. [8] But the principal acts of saving faith are accepting, receiving, and resting upon Christ alone for justification, sanctification, and eternal life, by virtue of the covenant of grace. [9] III. This faith is differ